Real-world Use Cases

These are patterns we've seen in the wild. Agents use groundcover to debug, monitor, and close the loop.

Test → Logs → Fix

Cursor generates tests, tags each with a test_id, logs them, and then uses groundcover to instantly fetch related log lines.

Investigate Issues via Cursor

Got a monitor firing? Drop the alert into Cursor. The agent runs a quick RCA, queries groundcover, and even suggests a patch based on recent logs and traces.

Support Workflow

Support rep gets an error ID → uses MCP to query groundcover → jumps straight to the root cause by exploring traces and logs around the error.

The Autonomous Loop

An agent picks up a ticket, writes tests, ships code to staging, monitors it with groundcover, checks logs and traces, and verifies the fix end to end. Yes, really. Full loop. Almost no hands.

Last updated